California ALJ Statistics
Social Security Disability hearing statistics for 17 hearing offices and 93 administrative law judges in California.
State Approval Rate
59.9%
vs 58.3% national
Hearing Offices
17
in California
ALJs
93
active judges
Avg Wait Time
8.5 months
vs 8 months national
Hearing Offices in California
| Office | ALJs | Approval Rate | Wait Time | Processing | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresno | 5 | 56% | 14.5 months | 481 days | 1,827 |
| Long Beach | 5 | 57.7% | 9 months | 312 days | 687 |
| Los Angeles Downtown | 4 | 58.3% | 8.5 months | 350 days | 822 |
| Los Angeles West | 7 | 63.2% | 10 months | 330 days | 1,237 |
| Moreno Valley | 7 | 53.2% | 8 months | 272 days | 1,590 |
| Norwalk | 5 | 66.1% | 7 months | 247 days | 805 |
| Oakland | 6 | 64.7% | 9 months | 321 days | 1,087 |
| Orange | 6 | 64% | 9 months | 323 days | 1,324 |
| Pasadena | 5 | 66.3% | 7 months | 274 days | 1,176 |
| Sacramento | 9 | 68% | 10 months | 333 days | 1,509 |
| San Bernardino | 7 | 60.7% | 7 months | 266 days | 981 |
| San Diego | 8 | 57.3% | 9 months | 376 days | 1,867 |
| San Francisco | 6 | 45.3% | 8 months | 309 days | 965 |
| San Jose | 5 | 59.1% | 10 months | 357 days | 755 |
| San Rafael | 3 | 60.5% | 8 months | 301 days | 605 |
| Santa Barbara | 3 | 63.1% | 13 months | 510 days | 664 |
| Stockton | 2 | 40.9% | 8 months | 274 days | 746 |
About California Disability Hearings
Disability claimants in California have access to 17 SSA hearing offices as part of Region 09. The state's 93 Administrative Law Judges handle the disability hearing caseload across these locations.
The average approval rate across California hearing offices is 59.9%, which is close to the national average of 58.3%. This rate aggregates decisions from all judges across the state's hearing offices. Within the state, office-level approval rates range from 40.9% at the Stockton hearing office to 68% at the Sacramento hearing office, a 27-point difference.
Wait times across California offices range from 7 months at the San Bernardino hearing office to 14.5 months at the Fresno hearing office. This 7.5-month gap between the fastest and slowest offices reflects differences in caseload volume, staffing levels, and scheduling capacity.
Across all offices, there are 18,647 cases currently pending in California, averaging approximately 201 pending cases per judge. Click on any hearing office below to see detailed judge-level statistics and individual approval rates.
California Hearing Landscape
With 17 hearing offices spread across the state, California's disability hearing landscape offers multiple points of comparison for attorneys and claimants. Case assignment is determined by residential address, so the specific office — and the judges at that office — depends on where the claimant lives. All statistics on this page are weighted by individual judge caseloads to accurately reflect the volume of cases processed.
With 17 hearing offices, California provides multiple venues for disability hearings. Office sizes vary from 2 judges at the Stockton hearing office to 9 judges at the Sacramento hearing office. Cases are assigned to offices based on the claimant's residential address, so hearing location is determined by geography rather than preference.
For attorneys practicing disability law in California, understanding the local hearing landscape is an important part of case preparation. The data on this page provides a starting point for evaluating office-level patterns, though individual judge statistics offer more granular insight into decision-making tendencies. Visit individual office pages for judge-level data.
California Disability Hearing FAQ
What is the disability approval rate in California?
How many Social Security hearing offices are in California?
Which hearing office in California has the shortest wait time?
How is state data calculated?
How does California compare to other states?
What factors influence hearing outcomes in California?
While all ALJs apply the same federal disability standards, these case-level factors can lead to variation in outcomes across offices and judges.